Cambridge Core - Contract Law - Unjustified Enrichment
九州大学学術情報リポジトリ Kyushu University Institutional Repository Subrogation in Insurance and Unjust Enrichment: An Examination of English and Japanese Laws from a...
In a court order unsealed last week, a California judge left only two claims standing: one... of unjust enrichment. This doesn’t mean the lawsuit is over. Litigation will likely continue...
A California court has partially dismissed a copyright case against OpenAI brought by several... and unjust enrichment. OpenAI asked to dismiss all counts but the first and main complaint...
Filing Date, Type, Action Taken ; 01/10/2024, Opinion and Order, Motion to dismiss granted in part and denied in part. ; 04/27/2023, Motion to Dismiss, Memorandum of law filed in support of motion to dismiss the first amended complaint. ; 01/05/2023, Complaint, First amended class action complaint filed.
a California judge ruled Monday, August 12. The artists filed a class-action lawsuit against... While District Judge William Orrick threw out the plaintiffs’ claims of unjust enrichment...
Communities taking Big Oil to court to hold companies accountable and make polluters pay.
Brudner, Alan, The Unity of The Common Law (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995)Google Scholar; and Jaffey, Peter, “Two Theories of Unjust Enrichment” in Neyers, Jason...
The maker of Stanley cups – whose viral beverage tumblers sent its revenues soaring from $75 million to $750 million last year – has landed on the receiving end of a new false advertising and fraud lawsuit. According to a proposed class action complaint filed in a state court in Los Angeles, California, on February 1, Pacific Market International (“PMI”) is allegedly on the hook for unfair business practices, fraud, false advertising, and unjust enrichment for failing to disclose that its wildly-popular products – including its 40 oz. ...
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION APPLE INC., Plaintiff, v. NSO GROUP TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, and Q CYBER TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, Defendants. Case...