In common law, a writ of qui tam is a writ through which private individuals who assist a prosecution can receive for themselves all or part of the damages or financial penalties recovered by the government as a result of the prosecution. Its name is an abbreviation of the Latin phrase qui...
Noun qui tam ( plural qui tams ) ( law ) A writ whereby a private individual who assists a prosecution can receive all or part of any penalty imposed.
Qui tam is the abbreviation for the Latin phrase “qui tam pro domino rege quam pro se ipso in hac parte sequitur,” meaning "Who sues on behalf of the King as well as for himself." · In a qui tam action, a relator brings an action against a person or company on the government's behalf. The government, not the relator, is considered the plaintiff. If the government succeeds, the relator bringing the suit receives a share of the award. This is also called a popular action. For example, the federal False Claims Act authorizes qui tam actions a ...
Definition of Qui tam in the Legal Dictionary - by Free online English dictionary and encyclopedia. What is Qui tam? Meaning of Qui tam as a legal term. What does Qui tam mean in law?
Definition of qui tam action in the Legal Dictionary - by Free online English dictionary and encyclopedia. What is qui tam action? Meaning of qui tam action as a legal term. What does qui tam actio...
Qui tam is a provision of the FCA allowing whistleblowers to report fraud on behalf of the US government and receive a share of the recovery.
The qui tam complaint must, by law, be filed under seal, which means that all records relating to the case must be kept on a secret docket by the Clerk of the Court. Copies of the complaint...
Qui tam has traditionally protected collective rights, so a crucial question about the viability of a privacy qui tam is whether violations of privacy law could be considered collective...
Case Name, Result, Attorney, Office ; Private Settlement, $15,000,000, James Young, ; Dr. Montejo v. Florida Hospital, $5,400,000, James Young, Orlando ; Heather Huddleston v. Florida Hospital, $2,090,000, James Young , John Yanchunis, Tampa ; Kelly Oxendine v. HCA, $2,000,000, James Young , John Yanchunis, ; Siwicki, Kathleen v. Portnow, Arthur S., M.D., $1,950,000, James Young , John Yanchunis, Tampa ; Government v. John Doe, M.D, et al., $1,950,000, James Young, ; Montes de Oca v. Conway Lakes, $1,500,000, James Young, Orlando ; John Doe v. Company, $1,380,000, James Young, ; Private Settlement, $1,000,000, James Young, ; $750,000 Whistleblower Settlement, $750,000, Paul Botros, Orlando
R40785 April 26, 2021 Charles Doyle Senior Specialist in American Public Law Qui Tam: The False Claims Act and Related Federal Statutes Congressional Research Service Contents Introduction....