A cram down or cramdown is the involuntary imposition by a court of a reorganization plan... and Chapter 13 bankruptcy proceedings were eventually upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in the...
이 세트의 단어 (107) ; 득점을 하다 : to score a point, 승부가 나다 : to have a game reach its conclusion, 승부욕이 강하다 : to feel very competitive, 연장전을 하다 : to go into overtime, 결승전에 진출하다 : to advance to the finals, 막상막하이다 : to be neck and neck/evenly matched in skill, 아슬아슬하다 : to be a close call, to be risky, 정정당당하다 : To be fair and square, 흥미진진하다 : to be exciting, 자신만만하다 : to be full of confidence, 규칙을 지키다 ...
In order to be eligible for a cram down, you must file a Chapter 13 bankruptcy. A chapter 13 bankruptcy allows you to make a repayment plan of most of your debts in the next three to five years. Repayment plans will not exceed five years. Filing a Chapter 13 bankruptcy also stays collection calls and efforts. ...
84bc8e95_hapter_6_Flashcards___Cram_com__l_objects_and_events_is_called ; [perception] Top-down processing ; The effect of prior experience and current expectations on perception best illustrates the importance of
Secured creditors will often do better in a Chapter 13 reorganization than unsecured creditors. How a Cramdown Works A cramdown provision (also known as "cram-down") is primarily used on...
Chapter 13 of the United States Bankruptcy Code provides an individual with the opportunity... a "cram down" modification of the debt; and prevent collection activities against non-filing...
If you aren't sure how Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 bankruptcy differ, you're not alone, and this article can help you learn about the benefits of each bankruptcy chapter. We've arranged the...
certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the seventh circuit ; No. 02–1016. Argued December 2, 2003—Decided May 17, 2004 ; Under the so-called “cram down option” permitted by the Bankruptcy Code, a Chapter 13 debtor’s proposed debt adjustment plan must provide each allowed, secured creditor both a lien securing the claim and a promise of future property disbursements whose total value, as of the plan’s date, “is not less than the [claim’s] allowed amount,” 11 U. S. C. §1325(a)(5)(B)(ii). When such plans provide for installment payments, each installment must be calibrated to ensure that the creditor receives disbursements whose total present value equals or exceeds that of the allowed claim. Respondent’s retail installment contract on petitioners’ truck had a secured value of $4,000 at the time petitioners filed a Chapter 13 petition. Petitioners’ proposed debt adjustment plan provided the amount that would be distributed to creditors each month and that petitioners would pay an annual 9.5% interest rate on respondent’s secured claim. This “prime-plus” or “formula rate” was reached by augmenting the national prime rate of 8% to account for the nonpayment risk posed by borrowers in petitioners’ financial position. In confirming the plan, the Bankruptcy Court overruled respondent’s objection that it was entitled to its contract interest rate of 21%. The District Court reversed, ruling that the 21% “coerced loan rate” was appropriate because cram down rates must be set at the level the creditor could have obtained had it foreclosed on the loan, sold the collateral, and reinvested the proceeds in equivalent loans. The Seventh Circuit modified that approach, holding that the original contract rate was a “presumptive rate” that could be challenged with evidence that a higher or lower rate should apply, and remanding the case to the Bankruptcy Court to afford the parties an opportunity to rebut the presumptive 21% rate. The dissent proposed a “cost of funds rate” that would simply ask what it would cost the creditor to obtain the cash equivalent of the collateral from another source.Read More
학생들은 또한 다음 세트를 보았습니다 ; 소신 발언 ; 정병권 단어 301, 정병권단어 101~301 ; 브릿지 전국 14 ; 빈출 관용어-숙어/ 콜로케이션 ; 95 단어 ; 이영수 주간지 w1d2 ; 매운맛 DAY27_접속사,관계사,의문사_1 ; 증상용어 ③ ; 문단 요약하기 ; 우진 최종 1
To qualify for court approval under Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code, an individual... the “cram down option” because it may be enforced over a claim holder’s objection.2 Associates...