AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion , 563 U.S. 333 (2011), is a legal dispute that was decided by the United States Supreme Court. On April 27, 2011, the Court ruled, by a 5–4 margin, that the Federal Arbitration Act of 1925 preempts state laws that prohibit contracts from disallowing class-w...
Merits Briefs Brief for Petitioner AT&T Mobility, LLC Brief for Respondents Vincent and Liza Concepcion Reply Brief for Petitioner AT&T Mobility, LLC Amicus Briefs Brief for Equal Employment Adviso...
AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion: Any state laws that forbid agreements that forestall class action arbitration are preempted and invalid under the Federal Arbitration Act of 1925.
20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press.AT&T MOBILITY LLC, PETITIONER v. VINCENT CONCEPCION et...
Media · Oral Argument - November 09, 2010 · Opinion Announcement - April 27, 2011 ; Opinions · Syllabus · Opinion of the Court (Scalia) · Concurring opinion (Thomas) · Dissenting opinion (Breyer)
Vincent and Liza Concepcion ("the Concepcions") signed a two-year service contract with AT&T Mobility for wireless phone service and received free cell phones from AT&T as a part of their...
321 .AT&T MOBILITY LLC v . CONCEPCION et ux. The cellular telephone contract between respondents (Concepcions) and petitioner (AT&T) provided for arbitration of all disputes, but did not...
AT&T 모빌리티 LLC v. Concession, 563 U.S. 333(2011년)은 미국 대법원이 결정한 법적 분쟁이다.[1][2] 2011년 4월 27일, 법원은 5 대 4의 차이로, 1925년의 연방 중재법이 이전에 디스커버 뱅크 대 상급 법원의 경우 캘리포니아...
AT or at may refer to: Geography Austria Austria (ISO 2-letter country code) .at, Internet country code top-level domain United States Atchison County, Kansas (county code) The Appalachian...
~~~Date~~~, ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ; Jan 25 2010, Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 25, 2010) ; Jan 27 2010, Order extending time to file response to petition to and including March 29, 2010. ; Jan 29 2010, Consent to the filing of amicus briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondents. ; Feb 2 2010, Consent to the filing of amicus briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioner. ; Feb 23 2010, Brief amici curiae of Pacific Legal Foundation, et al. filed. ; Feb 25 2010, Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America filed. ; Feb 25 2010, Brief amicus curiae of CTIA - The Wireless Association filed. ; Feb 25 2010, Brief amicus curiae of DRI - Voice of the Defense Bar filed. ; Mar 18 2010, Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including April 26, 2010. ; Apr 26 2010, Brief of respondents Vincent Concepcion, and Liza Concepcion in opposition filed. ; May 3 2010, Reply of petitioner AT&T Mobility LLC filed. ; May 4 2010, DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 20, 2010. ; May 7 2010, Supplemental brief of respondents filed. (Distributed) ; May 24 2010, Petition GRANTED. ; Jun 15 2010, The time within which to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including July 26, 2010. ; Jun 15 2010, The time within which to file respondents' brief on the merits is extended to and including September 15, 2010. ; Jun 17 2010, Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioner. ; Jun 21 2010, Consent to the filing of amicus briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondents. ; Jul 9 2010, Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner AT&T Mobility LLC. ; Jul 20 2010, The time within which to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is further extended to and including August 2, 2010. ; Jul 20 2010, The time within which to file respondents' brief on the merits is further extended to and including September 22, 2010. ; Aug 2 2010, Brief of petitioner AT&T Mobility LLC filed. ; Aug 9 2010, Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America filed. ; Aug 9 2010, Brief amicus curiae of Center for Class Action Fairness filed. ; Aug 9 2010, Brief amici curiae of Distinguished Law Professors filed. ; Aug 9 2010, Brief amicus curiae of Pacific Legal Foundation filed. ; Aug 9 2010, Brief amici curiae of American Bankers Association, et al. filed. ; Aug 9 2010, Brief amici curiae of DIRECTV, Inc., et al. filed. ; Aug 9 2010, Brief amicus curiae of CTIA - The Wireless Association filed. ; Aug 9 2010, Brief amicus curiae of Equal Employment Advisory Council filed. ; Aug 9 2010, Brief amicus curiae of DRI - Voice of the Defense Bar filed. ; Aug 9 2010, Brief amici curiae of South Carolina and Utah filed. ; Aug 9 2010, Brief amicus curiae of New England Legal Foundation filed. ; Aug 16 2010, Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner GRANTED. ; Aug 16 2010, CIRCULATED. ; Aug 24 2010, SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Tuesday, November 9, 2010. ; Sep 2 2010, Record received from U.S.C.A. for 9th Circuit. (1 envelope) ; Sep 2 2010, Record for U.S.D.C. for Southern District of California is electronic. ; Sep 7 2010, The time within which to file respondents' brief on the merits is further extended to and including September 29, 2010. ; Sep 29 2010, Brief of respondents Vincent Concepcion, and Liza Concepcion filed. (Distributed) ; Sep 30 2010, Brief amicus curiae of National Workrights Institute filed. (Distributed) ; Oct 5 2010, Brief amici curiae of Civil Procedure and Complex Litigation Professors filed. (Distributed) ; Oct 6 2010, Brief amicus curiae of NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc. filed. (Distributed) ; Oct 6 2010, Brief amici curiae of Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, et al. filed. (Distributed) ; Oct 6 2010, Brief amicus curiae of National Academy of Arbitrators filed. (Distributed) ; Oct 6 2010, Brief amici curiae of Contracts Professors filed. (Distributed) ; Oct 6 2010, Brief amicus curiae of American Antitrust Institute filed. (Distributed) ; Oct 6 2010, Brief amicus curiae of Jonathan C. Kaltwasser filed. (Distributed) ; Oct 6 2010, Brief amici curiae of Arbitration Professors filed. (Distributed) ; Oct 6 2010, Brief amici curiae of Illinois, et al. filed. (Distributed) ; Oct 6 2010, Brief amicus curiae of American Association for Justice filed. (Distributed) ; Oct 6 2010, Brief amicus curiae of Constitutional Accountability Center filed. (Distributed) ; Oct 6 2010, Brief amici curiae of Legal Aid Society of the District of Columbia and National Consumer Advocacy Organizations filed. (Distributed) ; Oct 6 2010, Brief amici curiae of Federal Jurisdiction Professors filed. (Distributed) ; Oct 6 2010, Brief amici curiae of Marygrace Coneff, et al. filed. (Distributed) ; Oct 29 2010, Reply of petitioner AT&T Mobility LLC filed. (Distributed) ; Nov 9 2010, Argued. For petitioner: Andrew J. Pincus, Washington, D. C. For respondents: Deepak Gupta, Washington, D. C. ; Apr 27 2011, Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Scalia, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Kennedy, Thomas, and Alito, JJ., joined. Thomas, J., filed a concurring opinion. Breyer, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined. ; May 31 2011, JUDGMENT ISSUED.